Ferritin: what is a good level?

Reference ranges are extremely wide — commonly about 30–400 ng/mL for men and 15–200 ng/mL for women, varying by laboratory. A woman with a ferritin of 18 ng/mL and a man at 350 ng/mL are both inside the printed range and both receive no flag.

Longevity-optimised target 50–100 ng/mL (men), 30–80 ng/mL (women)

This is the range used by the inflammatory dial in the Longevity Score calculator. It is deliberately tighter than the range printed on a standard lab report — the reasoning is below.

What your lab flags vs what the evidence supportsng/mL
Standard
30–400
Optimised
50–100 ng/mL (men), 30–80 ng/mL (women)
0200400

Nothing you type here is sent anywhere, stored, or logged. It never leaves this page.

A result anywhere in the pale band is reported as normal and generates no comment. The brighter band is where risk is lowest. The distance between them is the part a standard report does not tell you.

What Ferritin actually measures

Ferritin is the protein that stores iron inside cells. The small amount that leaks into serum is proportional to total body iron stores, which makes it the standard first-line test of iron status.

It is also an acute-phase reactant: inflammation raises it independently of iron. Ferritin therefore reports two different things at once, and separating them is the whole difficulty of interpreting it.

Why it matters

Iron is scored on the inflammatory dial rather than a nutritional one because the risk at both ends runs through oxidative stress. Free iron catalyses the reactions that generate reactive oxygen species.

Low ferritin means depleted stores, and the consequences — fatigue, impaired aerobic capacity, poor exercise adaptation, restless legs — appear well before anaemia does. Haemoglobin is the last thing to fall, not the first.

High ferritin, in the absence of inflammation, means iron accumulation. Iron is not actively excreted, so stores tend to rise with age in men and after menopause in women, and excess is associated with insulin resistance and liver injury.

Why it's on the dashboard

Ferritin earns a U-shaped band rather than a simple floor or ceiling because the evidence runs in both directions at once. On lifespan, Kadoglou et al.'s English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (PLOS ONE, 2017), following 5,471 adults over 50 for a mean of 7.7 years, found the highest ferritin quartile in men (194–598 ng/mL) carried a 49% higher all-cause mortality risk even after excluding major chronic disease at baseline — while the lowest quartile in women carried its own excess risk, the same U-shape this dial's band is built to catch, in one dataset. On healthspan, Vaucher et al.'s randomised controlled trial (CMAJ, 2012) gave oral iron to 198 non-anaemic women with unexplained fatigue and ferritin under 50 µg/L and found fatigue scores improved significantly more than with placebo in 12 weeks — causal evidence, not just correlation, that depleted iron stores cause real functional symptoms well before haemoglobin falls. See the Inflammatory dial for the broader context.

Why this range is stricter than your lab's

The lower bound of the standard range is set at the point where iron-deficiency anaemia becomes likely, not where iron stores are adequate for normal function. Symptomatic deficiency is routine between 15 and 30 ng/mL.

The upper bound is similarly permissive, drawn from a population in which subclinical inflammation and gradual iron loading are both common. A value of 300 ng/mL is typical of the population and not a sign of health.

Because the harm is U-shaped, this is one of the few markers where the engine penalises both directions. More is not better, and the optimum is a band rather than a floor or a ceiling.

This distinction applies across the whole panel, not just this marker — see optimal versus standard lab ranges for the general case.

What moves Ferritin

Finding the cause of a low value
In anyone past adolescence who is not menstruating heavily, unexplained iron deficiency warrants investigation for a source of blood loss before supplementing. This matters more than the supplement.
Iron supplementation
Effective where deficiency is confirmed. Alternate-day dosing is absorbed better than daily. Do not supplement iron without a measured deficiency.
Vitamin C with iron-containing meals
Substantially increases absorption of non-haem iron; tea and coffee with meals reduce it.
Blood donation
The only practical way to lower genuinely high stores, and a reasonable option for men with a persistently elevated value.
Alcohol reduction
Raises both iron absorption and liver-derived ferritin; a common cause of a mildly elevated result.
Treating the inflammation
Where ferritin is high because of inflammation rather than iron, lowering the inflammation is the intervention. Read it alongside hs-CRP.

Educational information, not a treatment plan. Discuss changes to medication or supplementation with a clinician who knows your history.

How fast it responds

Months. Stores change slowly in either direction — three to six months to correct a deficiency, and comparably long to reduce an elevated value. Retest no sooner than 12 weeks. See response times across all markers for how this compares.

What can distort the result

Score Ferritin against all 8 dials

Frequently asked questions

What is a good Ferritin level?

The longevity-optimised target used in this calculator is 50–100 ng/mL (men), 30–80 ng/mL (women). Reference ranges are extremely wide — commonly about 30–400 ng/mL for men and 15–200 ng/mL for women, varying by laboratory. A woman with a ferritin of 18 ng/mL and a man at 350 ng/mL are both inside the printed range and both receive no flag.

Why is this target stricter than the range on my lab report?

The lower bound of the standard range is set at the point where iron-deficiency anaemia becomes likely, not where iron stores are adequate for normal function. Symptomatic deficiency is routine between 15 and 30 ng/mL.

How fast does Ferritin respond to change?

Months. Stores change slowly in either direction — three to six months to correct a deficiency, and comparably long to reduce an elevated value. Retest no sooner than 12 weeks.

Ferritin feeds the inflammatory dial, and read it alongside hs-CRP · ALT.

All biomarkers

Not medical advice. These are longevity-optimised reference ranges, which are deliberately stricter than standard clinical "normal" values. A value outside them does not mean you have a disease. Speak to a qualified healthcare professional before changing medication, supplements or training. Full disclaimer.
Ask Us

Choose a question. Answers come from this site, and nothing you open is sent anywhere.

What is a good Ferritin level?

The longevity-optimised target used in this calculator is 50–100 ng/mL (men), 30–80 ng/mL (women). Reference ranges are extremely wide — commonly about 30–400 ng/mL for men and 15–200 ng/mL for women, varying by laboratory. A woman with a ferritin of 18 ng/mL and a man at 350 ng/mL are both inside the printed range and both receive no flag.

Why is this target stricter than the range on my lab report?

The lower bound of the standard range is set at the point where iron-deficiency anaemia becomes likely, not where iron stores are adequate for normal function. Symptomatic deficiency is routine between 15 and 30 ng/mL.

How fast does Ferritin respond to change?

Months. Stores change slowly in either direction — three to six months to correct a deficiency, and comparably long to reduce an elevated value. Retest no sooner than 12 weeks.

What is biological age?

Chronological age counts birthdays. Biological age estimates how old your body appears to be functioning, based on measurable biomarkers. Two people born the same year can differ by a decade or more in vascular stiffness, insulin signalling or cardiorespiratory fitness. Biological age makes that gap explicit — and unlike your birthday, it can move in either direction.

How is the Longevity Score calculated?

Each biomarker you enter is scored against longevity-optimised reference ranges and grouped into one of eight dials. Every dial produces its own biological age, and those are combined using fixed weights into a single composite, then expressed as a Longevity Score from 0 to 100. The weighting reflects how strongly each system predicts healthspan: structural and vascular carry the most, hormonal the least.

Do I need all 53 biomarkers?

No. The short form contains a subset of scoring inputs plus context-only fields, and you can leave any of them blank. It is not a recommendation to obtain tests. Missing values are excluded from the calculation — never treated as zero or as 'normal'. A dial with no scored data is dropped entirely and the remaining weights renormalise.

What can I measure without a blood test?

Some inputs can be measured without bloodwork. Blood pressure needs a home cuff and waist-to-height needs a tape measure. Wearable estimates vary; the floor-based sitting-rising test carries a fall risk and should only be attempted if safe.

Is this an anti-aging calculator? Is it a healthspan calculator?

Both terms describe what this tool does, and which one fits depends on what you are asking. "Anti-aging" is the term most people search, and loosely means anything aimed at slowing or reversing age-related decline — this tool fits that description if you score your dials and act on what you find. "Healthspan calculator" is the more precise term: healthspan is the number of years lived without serious chronic disease or disability, and that cannot be measured directly, so this tool scores eight systems that each function as an early-warning proxy for it. Either way, the method is the same: real biomarkers, published thresholds, no vanity-metric framing.

Why don't you have a quick quiz that skips biomarkers entirely?

Several popular tools ask only about habits — exercise days, sleep hours, smoking, diet quality — and return a single precise-looking age. We looked at the research behind that approach and chose not to build it. Published studies do show real, individually-measured links between specific habits and epigenetic age acceleration, but those effect sizes come from different study populations, different DNA-methylation clocks and different measurement units. Adding them together into one number is not something the underlying research actually supports — it produces a precise-looking result built on an imprecise method. Our dials use direct physiological measurements instead: a real blood pressure reading, a real VO₂ max, a real ApoB value. Several dials score from home-measurable data alone with no quiz-guessing involved — see what you can measure without a blood test, above.

Why are your 'optimal' ranges stricter than my lab's normal range?

Standard reference ranges describe what is common in a general population, which now includes a great deal of metabolic dysfunction. They are tuned to flag disease, not to identify what is optimal for a long healthspan. A fasting insulin of 20 µIU/mL sits inside most labs' normal range and is strongly associated with insulin resistance. This tool uses longevity-optimised thresholds instead, so a flag here means room for optimisation — not a diagnosis.

All questions