This site publishes health information, so it should be clear who writes it, who checks it, and what happens when something is wrong.
Content is written by the authors of the 8 Dials of Longevity framework. Naomi Fayzulayev, FNP-C, MSN, a board-certified Family Nurse Practitioner, reviews clinical material for the site.
Each page names the clinician who reviewed it. Consult a qualified clinician for individual medical decisions.
Ranges come from published outcome literature and clinical practice, not from a single source or a proprietary algorithm. They are longevity-optimised, meaning deliberately stricter than standard clinical cut-offs, and the site says so on every page that uses them.
The methodology page explains the scoring model in full, including the weights and how missing data is handled.
Supplement and intervention suggestions carry an evidence tier: A for consistent human randomised-trial support, B for mixed or mechanistic evidence, C for early or anecdotal. The tier reflects evidence strength and nothing else.
No recommendation is added, removed or re-ranked because of a commercial relationship. If that ever changes, this page changes first.
If something here is wrong, we want to fix it rather than defend it. Corrections to a clinical claim are made promptly and the review date is updated.
Engine changes that affect scoring are versioned and recorded, so a changed result can always be traced to a specific change rather than appearing unexplained.
We do not publish dosing protocols for substances that are not approved for the use described, and named peptide protocols are deliberately removed from the public build.
We do not publish content designed to rank rather than to inform, and we do not present a commercial relationship as a clinical recommendation.
Calculate your Longevity Score free →Choose a question. Answers come from this site, and nothing you open is sent anywhere.
Chronological age counts birthdays. Biological age estimates how old your body appears to be functioning, based on measurable biomarkers. Two people born the same year can differ by a decade or more in vascular stiffness, insulin signalling or cardiorespiratory fitness. Biological age makes that gap explicit — and unlike your birthday, it can move in either direction.
Each biomarker you enter is scored against longevity-optimised reference ranges and grouped into one of eight dials. Every dial produces its own biological age, and those are combined using fixed weights into a single composite, then expressed as a Longevity Score from 0 to 100. The weighting reflects how strongly each system predicts healthspan: structural and vascular carry the most, hormonal the least.
No. The short form contains a subset of scoring inputs plus context-only fields, and you can leave any of them blank. It is not a recommendation to obtain tests. Missing values are excluded from the calculation — never treated as zero or as 'normal'. A dial with no scored data is dropped entirely and the remaining weights renormalise.
Some inputs can be measured without bloodwork. Blood pressure needs a home cuff and waist-to-height needs a tape measure. Wearable estimates vary; the floor-based sitting-rising test carries a fall risk and should only be attempted if safe.
Both terms describe what this tool does, and which one fits depends on what you are asking. "Anti-aging" is the term most people search, and loosely means anything aimed at slowing or reversing age-related decline — this tool fits that description if you score your dials and act on what you find. "Healthspan calculator" is the more precise term: healthspan is the number of years lived without serious chronic disease or disability, and that cannot be measured directly, so this tool scores eight systems that each function as an early-warning proxy for it. Either way, the method is the same: real biomarkers, published thresholds, no vanity-metric framing.
Several popular tools ask only about habits — exercise days, sleep hours, smoking, diet quality — and return a single precise-looking age. We looked at the research behind that approach and chose not to build it. Published studies do show real, individually-measured links between specific habits and epigenetic age acceleration, but those effect sizes come from different study populations, different DNA-methylation clocks and different measurement units. Adding them together into one number is not something the underlying research actually supports — it produces a precise-looking result built on an imprecise method. Our dials use direct physiological measurements instead: a real blood pressure reading, a real VO₂ max, a real ApoB value. Several dials score from home-measurable data alone with no quiz-guessing involved — see what you can measure without a blood test, above.
Standard reference ranges describe what is common in a general population, which now includes a great deal of metabolic dysfunction. They are tuned to flag disease, not to identify what is optimal for a long healthspan. A fasting insulin of 20 µIU/mL sits inside most labs' normal range and is strongly associated with insulin resistance. This tool uses longevity-optimised thresholds instead, so a flag here means room for optimisation — not a diagnosis.
For understanding a single result, do — a frontier chat model is genuinely good at that, often clearer than most medical sites, and it handles markers no fixed tool covers. The limitation is different from the one most people assume. A language model produces a plausible response rather than a computed one, so the same panel can score differently on different days. That is fine when exploring an idea and disqualifying when measuring change, because you cannot tell how much of a difference is you and how much is the method. Use both: a chat model to understand, a fixed instrument to track.
Biomarker values, assessment history and visit-preparation drafts are stored in your browser. The visit draft is separate from assessment exports and share links; copying or printing it can leave a copy outside the browser. There are no user accounts or third-party tracking. We keep anonymous usage totals on our own server, such as how many people reached a results screen on a given day; browsers sending Do Not Track or Global Privacy Control are not counted. Optional lab-report upload and AI coach features send data to Anthropic. Optional retest reminders send an email address, date and reminder label to our service and email provider. See our privacy policy for details.
No. It is an educational and personal-tracking tool. The estimates are not clinically validated and must not replace evaluation by a qualified healthcare professional. If a result concerns you — particularly kidney markers, blood pressure or ApoB — take it to a doctor rather than acting on it alone.