ALT: what is a good level?

Upper limits of about 40–55 U/L for men and 33–45 U/L for women are typical, varying widely between laboratories. These were derived from reference populations that included many people with undiagnosed fatty liver, so the "normal" range partly describes the disease it should detect.

Longevity-optimised target under 20 U/L (men), under 15 U/L (women)

This is the range used by the organ dial in the Longevity Score calculator. It is deliberately tighter than the range printed on a standard lab report — the reasoning is below.

What your lab flags vs what the evidence supportsU/L
Standard
0–40
Optimised
under 20 U/L (men), under 15 U/L (women)
027.555

Nothing you type here is sent anywhere, stored, or logged. It never leaves this page.

A result anywhere in the pale band is reported as normal and generates no comment. The brighter band is where risk is lowest. The distance between them is the part a standard report does not tell you.

What ALT actually measures

ALT is an enzyme concentrated in liver cells. When those cells are stressed or damaged, ALT leaks into the blood, so the serum level is an indirect measure of ongoing hepatocyte injury.

It is more liver-specific than AST, which is also abundant in muscle. A raised AST with a normal ALT after heavy training is usually muscle, not liver.

Why it matters

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease now affects roughly a quarter to a third of adults in many countries, and it is usually silent. A mildly raised ALT is frequently its only laboratory sign.

Liver fat is not a local problem. It drives hepatic insulin resistance, raises VLDL output and therefore triglycerides, and tracks closely with visceral adiposity — which is why ALT often moves in step with the metabolic and atherogenic dials.

Within the standard normal range, higher ALT is associated with higher cardiometabolic risk and mortality. The information in a result of 35 U/L is being discarded by reporting it as normal.

Why it's on the dashboard

ALT made the panel because it is frequently the only laboratory sign of a condition — fatty liver — that now affects roughly a quarter to a third of adults silently. The lifespan case comes directly from the population this dial's thresholds are built on: Kim et al. (BMJ, 2004) followed over 142,000 Korean adults for 8 years and found that even within the conventional normal range, higher aminotransferase levels predicted substantially higher liver-disease mortality — the relative risk for liver-related death was roughly 3-fold higher at 20-29 U/L and nearly 10-fold higher at 30-39 U/L compared with under 20 U/L, the exact distinction this engine's stricter thresholds are drawing. The healthspan case is about where fatty liver spends its damage beyond the liver itself: Sinn et al. (Hepatology, 2022), following over 52,000 adults, found those with fatty liver disease lost appendicular skeletal muscle mass significantly faster over 5 years than those without it, with more severe disease predicting faster loss — a direct link between this marker and the same muscle mass this dashboard's structural dial is built to protect. See the Organ dial for the broader context.

Why this range is stricter than your lab's

Reference intervals are conventionally set as the central 95% of a reference population. When a third of that population has fatty liver, the resulting upper limit encodes the condition into normality.

Studies that excluded people with viral hepatitis, raised BMI and abnormal lipids found healthy upper limits closer to 30 U/L for men and 19 U/L for women — far below most printed ranges.

The optimised thresholds follow that work. They are sex-specific because the healthy distributions genuinely differ, and the engine scores them separately rather than applying a single cutoff.

This distinction applies across the whole panel, not just this marker — see optimal versus standard lab ranges for the general case.

What moves ALT

Visceral and hepatic fat reduction
The dominant lever by a wide margin. A 7–10% reduction in body weight substantially reduces liver fat, and ALT follows.
Fructose and refined carbohydrate
Drive hepatic de novo lipogenesis directly. Liquid fructose is the most concentrated exposure.
Alcohol
Dose-dependent hepatocyte injury, and it compounds with metabolic liver fat rather than simply adding to it.
Exercise
Reduces liver fat measurably even without weight loss; both aerobic and resistance training work.
Coffee
Consistently associated with lower ALT and slower fibrosis progression across large cohorts.
Medication and supplement review
Statins, paracetamol at high doses, some antibiotics and a long list of supplements — including high-dose niacin and green tea extract — raise ALT. Review before assuming a lifestyle cause.

Educational information, not a treatment plan. Discuss changes to medication or supplementation with a clinician who knows your history.

How fast it responds

Weeks to months. ALT responds to reduced liver fat within about 8–12 weeks of sustained change, which makes it a reasonable way to confirm that a metabolic intervention is working. See response times across all markers for how this compares.

What can distort the result

Score ALT against all 8 dials

Frequently asked questions

What is a good ALT level?

The longevity-optimised target used in this calculator is under 20 U/L (men), under 15 U/L (women). Upper limits of about 40–55 U/L for men and 33–45 U/L for women are typical, varying widely between laboratories. These were derived from reference populations that included many people with undiagnosed fatty liver, so the "normal" range partly describes the disease it should detect.

Why is this target stricter than the range on my lab report?

Reference intervals are conventionally set as the central 95% of a reference population. When a third of that population has fatty liver, the resulting upper limit encodes the condition into normality.

How fast does ALT respond to change?

Weeks to months. ALT responds to reduced liver fat within about 8–12 weeks of sustained change, which makes it a reasonable way to confirm that a metabolic intervention is working.

ALT feeds the organ dial, and read it alongside Ferritin · Triglycerides.

Ready to act on it? How to lower ALT ranks the interventions by leverage and says what does not work.

All biomarkers

Not medical advice. These are longevity-optimised reference ranges, which are deliberately stricter than standard clinical "normal" values. A value outside them does not mean you have a disease. Speak to a qualified healthcare professional before changing medication, supplements or training. Full disclaimer.
Ask Us

Choose a question. Answers come from this site, and nothing you open is sent anywhere.

What is a good ALT level?

The longevity-optimised target used in this calculator is under 20 U/L (men), under 15 U/L (women). Upper limits of about 40–55 U/L for men and 33–45 U/L for women are typical, varying widely between laboratories. These were derived from reference populations that included many people with undiagnosed fatty liver, so the "normal" range partly describes the disease it should detect.

Why is this target stricter than the range on my lab report?

Reference intervals are conventionally set as the central 95% of a reference population. When a third of that population has fatty liver, the resulting upper limit encodes the condition into normality.

How fast does ALT respond to change?

Weeks to months. ALT responds to reduced liver fat within about 8–12 weeks of sustained change, which makes it a reasonable way to confirm that a metabolic intervention is working.

What is biological age?

Chronological age counts birthdays. Biological age estimates how old your body appears to be functioning, based on measurable biomarkers. Two people born the same year can differ by a decade or more in vascular stiffness, insulin signalling or cardiorespiratory fitness. Biological age makes that gap explicit — and unlike your birthday, it can move in either direction.

How is the Longevity Score calculated?

Each biomarker you enter is scored against longevity-optimised reference ranges and grouped into one of eight dials. Every dial produces its own biological age, and those are combined using fixed weights into a single composite, then expressed as a Longevity Score from 0 to 100. The weighting reflects how strongly each system predicts healthspan: structural and vascular carry the most, hormonal the least.

Do I need all 53 biomarkers?

No. The short form contains a subset of scoring inputs plus context-only fields, and you can leave any of them blank. It is not a recommendation to obtain tests. Missing values are excluded from the calculation — never treated as zero or as 'normal'. A dial with no scored data is dropped entirely and the remaining weights renormalise.

What can I measure without a blood test?

Some inputs can be measured without bloodwork. Blood pressure needs a home cuff and waist-to-height needs a tape measure. Wearable estimates vary; the floor-based sitting-rising test carries a fall risk and should only be attempted if safe.

Is this an anti-aging calculator? Is it a healthspan calculator?

Both terms describe what this tool does, and which one fits depends on what you are asking. "Anti-aging" is the term most people search, and loosely means anything aimed at slowing or reversing age-related decline — this tool fits that description if you score your dials and act on what you find. "Healthspan calculator" is the more precise term: healthspan is the number of years lived without serious chronic disease or disability, and that cannot be measured directly, so this tool scores eight systems that each function as an early-warning proxy for it. Either way, the method is the same: real biomarkers, published thresholds, no vanity-metric framing.

Why don't you have a quick quiz that skips biomarkers entirely?

Several popular tools ask only about habits — exercise days, sleep hours, smoking, diet quality — and return a single precise-looking age. We looked at the research behind that approach and chose not to build it. Published studies do show real, individually-measured links between specific habits and epigenetic age acceleration, but those effect sizes come from different study populations, different DNA-methylation clocks and different measurement units. Adding them together into one number is not something the underlying research actually supports — it produces a precise-looking result built on an imprecise method. Our dials use direct physiological measurements instead: a real blood pressure reading, a real VO₂ max, a real ApoB value. Several dials score from home-measurable data alone with no quiz-guessing involved — see what you can measure without a blood test, above.

Why are your 'optimal' ranges stricter than my lab's normal range?

Standard reference ranges describe what is common in a general population, which now includes a great deal of metabolic dysfunction. They are tuned to flag disease, not to identify what is optimal for a long healthspan. A fasting insulin of 20 µIU/mL sits inside most labs' normal range and is strongly associated with insulin resistance. This tool uses longevity-optimised thresholds instead, so a flag here means room for optimisation — not a diagnosis.

All questions